AI 智能体

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

LLM Agent-Based Design of RISC-V CPUs with FPGA-in-the-Loop Evaluation

Long-run RTL simulation of CPU candidates can take hours, while short diagnostic runs may miss performance degradation that emerges later in execution. This evaluation cost can delay design decisions in LLM-agent-based CPU development. We present a development environment in which LLM agents implement CPU candidates on an FPGA and use on-board performance measurements to guide design decisions. We applied it to the human-supervised development of a single-cycle RV32I core into a three-wide out-of-order RV32IM core. The final design reaches 5.61 CoreMark/MHz at 130 MHz on a Artix-7 FPGA. For the same CPU candidate running 8,000 CoreMark iterations, FPGA evaluation, including implementation, was 9.6x faster than single-threaded RTL simulation. In one case, board measurements revealed long-run performance degradation in a candidate that improved in a short diagnostic run. The result guided candidate selection and led to RTL-based root-cause analysis and a fix.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

InterA11y: Interactive Web Accessibility Error Detection with LLM Agents

Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown potential to expand the coverage of web accessibility evaluation. However, current LLM-based checkers neglect much of the interactive and dynamic web contexts, resulting in limited coverage, high false discovery rates, and inconsistent performance across models. We present InterA11y, an agentic accessibility evaluation system that combines rubrics and interactive tools to support LLM agents in evaluating accessibility effectively. The rubrics decompose WCAG success criteria (SC) into testable aspects and guide agents in collecting and interpreting evidence. The interactive tools inspect or operate a webpage deterministically to collect evidence, such as focus appearances and error messages. We developed these rubrics and tools on 682 curated test cases grounded in established accessibility guidelines that target 10 commonly violated SC. We evaluated InterA11y on 197 expert-annotated cases sampled from 54 real webpages. Results show InterA11y achieves higher recall than the strongest evaluated LLM-driven baseline (79.0% vs. 44.4%), while maintaining comparable precision to best rule-based checkers (93.1% vs. 90.3-97.6%), with little variability between models. Further, when equipped with our interactive tools, general-purpose web agents detect more accessibility errors with fewer false positives and less token usage than without these tools.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

OPERA: OPamp Design by an Expert-Taught Reasoning Agent, from Specifications to Layout

Analog flows from specifications to a signed-off layout rarely run without manual iteration. Recent large language model (LLM) agents size circuits with optimizer loops over the device dimensions and stop at the schematic. We present OPERA (OPamp design by an Expert-taught Reasoning Agent), in which a general-purpose LLM agent designs CMOS opamps from specifications to post-layout sign-off with open-source tools. First, the designer teaches the agent the gm/ID method: map the specifications to transconductances and minimum currents, choose gm/ID per device role from characterized lookup tables, and size from equations, leaving a few knobs to search and an explainable design. Second, the agent learns the gLayout framework and taught layout practice, and writes a reusable layout generator that closes the layout and extraction loop at designer-approved gates. In SKY130, the agent designed a shared constant-gm bias and six opamps (5T, folded-cascode and telescopic OTAs; Miller, folded-cascode and telescopic two-stage) for fun >= 50 MHz, PM >= 60 degrees, SR 25 V/μs into 1 pF and a minimum dc gain of 30 to 60 dB. All six layouts are DRC-clean and LVS-matched, and their extracted netlists meet every target at all 15 PVT corners ( fun >= 53.7 MHz, PM >= 62.1 degrees, SR >= 27.9 V/μs). The benchmark netlists are released at https://github.com/AMPICLab/AMPICBench.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

Can AI Agents Interface Clinicians and Complex Models?

Background: Contemporary healthcare institutions generate daily very large amounts of data, which contain highly useful information for the improvement of work organization, planning and overall efficiency. While models and techniques to extract these insights are well known and constantly developed in mathematical biology, complex systems physics and data science, the adoption of these techniques among Clinicians and Hospital Administrators remains limited, mainly due to language and methodological divides. Objective: In this article we implement an AI Multi Agent System (MAS) that allows Users to use predictive models and make statistical analyses via natural language conversations. Methods: We developed EpidemIA, a training-free MAS endowed with a modular suite of epidemiological models written by human experts, executable on a single-GPU workstation. To avoid relaying sensitive data to third parties, the system uses locally an open-weights LLM as backbone for its two subagents. Results: Using a dataset of Emergency Department visits provided to us by IRCCS Sant'Orsola (Bologna) we test the model on a few typical use cases, demonstrating the possibility of performing both simpler statistical analyses and visualizations as well as more complicated epidemiological predictions based on dynamical models, through simple queries made in natural language. Conclusions: While still being a proof-of-concept implementation, EpidemIA showcases the transformative capabilities of LLM based technologies as an enabling factor in the widespread adoption of complex dynamical models, which is at present hindered by their steep learning curve.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

Sticky Collusion: Persistence of LLM Agent Collusion after Incentive Removal and Partner Replacement

We ask whether collusion between AI agents survives once formed, when its incentive is removed or a colluder is replaced. Q-learning pricing agents stop colluding with a new rival; we test whether LLM agents do. We use the joint-task environment of Shi et al.\ (2026), where two agents verify each other's work under a rule they cannot satisfy and a reward that favours acceptance. We save each pair's history once its collusion has formed and resume it under interventions, with three models (GPT-6-Luna, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash and Gemini-3.1-Flash-Lite), \TotalHistories{} saved histories and \TotalRuns{} runs. Collusion is \emph{sticky}. First, it outlives its incentive: told that the reward has stopped, pairs still accept each other's unverified work in \GptToldRate, \DsToldRate{} and \GemToldRate{} of episodes, including pairs whose collusion began with an explicit agreement, and a payoff penalty has no significant effect. Second, replacing a colluder ends the pair's collusion but not the colluder's behaviour. Without the reward, the remaining colluder still accepts unverified work in \GptSwapSilentColluderRate, \DsSwapSilentColluderRate{} and \GemSwapSilentColluderRate{} of its verdicts while the newcomer never does; with the reward, collusion re-forms around it, even when the newcomer is a different model. Third, the agents' memory carries it: wiping memory ends it in every history, but partial memory often sustains it. Fourth, removing its cause ends collusion that has already formed: once the channel is repaired, colluders reject planted faulty work as reliably as fresh agents, immediately and with no monitor needed to catch it first.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

Agentic LLM reasoning in pediatric diabetes outcome prediction from multimodal medical records

Large language model (LLM) agents are proposed for clinical prediction but are untested in pediatrics, where cohorts are small and outcomes are uncommon. Using records from 2,489 youth with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and 4,018 with type 1 diabetes (T1D), spanning structured data, note-derived social determinants and, in T1D, continuous glucose monitoring data, we predicted seven T2D outcomes, four also in T1D, at 24 months from 18 months of follow-up. CEDAR (Clinical Evidence-Driven Agent for Risk-prediction), an evidence-citing, self-auditing LLM pipeline, outperformed trained machine learning in both cohorts (pooled area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.815 versus 0.656 to 0.700 in T2D and 0.756 versus 0.603 to 0.631 in T1D), most on the sparsely screened outcomes. Only 4 of 70,246 values it cited did not match the chart. Reading only the evidence and reasoning cited by CEDAR, two pediatric endocrinologists reached the same prediction as CEDAR in about nine of ten cases, agreeing with each other on 90.5%.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

Don't Lose the Thread: Empowering Long-Horizon LLM Agents with Cognitive Resource Self-Allocation

Agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable progress in solving complex reasoning tasks. However, LLM agents often falter on long-horizon tasks due to cognitive overload, as their working memory becomes cluttered with expanding and irrelevant information, which dilutes their attention and hinders effective planning and reasoning. To mitigate this challenge, we introduce Cognitive Resource Self-Allocation (CORAL), a novel reasoning paradigm that empowers agents to proactively optimize their context. Implemented as an agent-callable working memory management toolset, CORAL allows an agent to checkpoint its task progress and verified facts, and adaptively initiate a new problem-solving episode by resetting cluttered context while preserving only the checkpointed information, enabling it to resume reasoning from a clean state. We further enhance the agent's checkpointing capabilities using a Multi-episode Agentic Reinforced Policy Optimization algorithm. On the GAIA benchmark, CORAL with an 8B model achieves 42.8% average accuracy, with particularly strong gains on the most challenging long-horizon tasks (Level 2 and Level 3). Crucially, these gains come at a substantially lower inference cost: CORAL consumes 6-7$\times$ fewer input tokens than a ReAct agent. It also generalizes to multi-hop Knowledge QA benchmarks and to the considerably harder BrowseComp, where it improves a strong proprietary agent by 8.0 points.

arXiv

预印本arXiv · Computer Science·2026年10月29日

Collaborative AI agents for autonomous experimental research with solid-state quantum spins

An autonomous research laboratory could conduct an entire study, from formulating questions to preparing manuscripts. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers one route towards this goal. Recent AI systems take on several research roles, but may draw conclusions that the evidence does not support. Here, we present an autonomous research laboratory in which agents based on large language models assess one another's work and can stop or redirect investigations. They can generate and reject research questions, require separate theoretical checks and conduct experiments designed to challenge their claims. We demonstrate these capabilities by investigating ensembles of quantum spins in diamond. The agents derived the minimum number of calibration settings needed to predict responses to a defined family of microwave pulse sequences. They checked the result computationally and designed experiments to distinguish competing predictions. An initial experiment agreed with the theoretical predictions, but repeated reference measurements showed that the signal was drifting during data collection. The agents therefore treated the result as inconclusive and revised the measurement protocol without relaxing the acceptance criteria. The revised experiment met those criteria and supported the theoretical predictions. This study demonstrates that collaborating AI agents can select research questions, derive theoretical results and test their predictions experimentally.

AI

研究OpenAI Research·2026年10月27日

OpenAI expands partnership with Oracle to bring its apps to ChatGPT

OpenAI and Oracle are expanding their partnership to bring business applications and AI agents into ChatGPT and power new Oracle offerings.

TS

新闻The Sequence·2026年10月28日

The Sequence Learning Loop - Issue #960: Last Week in AI Infrastructure

DeepSeek, Google, and NVIDIA build the agent stack